43 Tanya Jakusconek: Great. And Bill, thank you very much for providing the five-year guidance -- really helpful to see, directionally, where the company is going. So, thank you for that. Might come back just to maybe the -- I'll start with the environment out there. Thank you for the slide showing that the deal size is getting bigger. And it looks like the concentration is really in the hands of three companies. I always ask on conference calls, “what size are you seeing out there?? And usually that $100 million to $300 million, maybe it goes up to $500 million. Should I be thinking now that this environment for you is in excess of $500 million in terms of what you're seeing out there and your ability to do to take you over $1 billion very easily, should I be thinking about it that way? William Heissenbuttel: Dan or Jason? Daniel Breeze: Tanya, it's Dan Breeze here. Look, I think the range that we always give you still applies, and maybe it's moved up a little bit more. We always say $100 million to $300 million, maybe it's $200 million to $400 million. We certainly see opportunities now in the $500 million, even plus, range. But they're not very plentiful. I think that's the way to say it. I think the bulk of them are still in the sub-$500 million range. Is your question, again, more around liquidity in terms of how we would fund a large deal? Tanya Jakusconek: Like you're going to pay off $600 million by the end of the year, that's $1.4 billion available, so, plus cash flow. So, I would assume you could do over $1 billion, maybe, I'm assuming that's correct? Daniel Breeze: Yes. That's -- Yes. Tanya Jakusconek: Yes. Okay. And maybe we were talking about asset concentration in terms of your portfolio when you're doing -- you're looking at these deals. I mean obviously I think there’s opportunities in doubling down in some of the districts that you're already in. How do you think about it from an operator concentration?