COPPER RESERVES Proven Probable Proven and Probable Metallurgical Tonnes Grade Contained Tonnes Grade Contained Tonnes Grade Contained Recovery Property Category (kt) (%) (Mlb) (kt) (%) (Mlb) (kt) (%) (Mlb) (%) Mount Milligan 3 Principal 187,961 0.19 808 76,551 0.20 342 264,512 0.20 1,150 79% Red Chris 23 Producing – – – 266,286 0.51 3,020 266,286 0.51 3,020 80% OP 84%UG Voisey’s Bay 91 Producing 14,000 0.80 247 15,333 0.85 287 29,333 0.83 534 80-85% Cactus 89 Development – – – – – – – – – N/A Don Mario 37 Development 2,057 1.89 86 – – – 2,057 1.89 86 Undisclosed Kundip 39 Development – – – 3,950 0.12 11 3,950 0.12 11 N/A Kutcho Creek 40 Development 1,700 1.64 61 4,310 1.77 168 6,010 1.73 230 87.6-94.5% Las Cruces 92 Development 16,000 1.23 434 25,600 1.08 608 41,600 1.14 1,042 85% NuevaUnión 44 Development 116,040 0.58 1,484 88,620 0.42 821 204,660 0.51 2,304 88% COPPER RESOURCES (EXCLUSIVE OF RESERVES) Measured Indicated (M) + (I) Inferred Metallurgical Tonnes Grade Contained Tonnes Grade Contained Contained Tonnes Grade Contained Recovery Property Category (kt) (%) (Mlb) (kt) (%) (Mlb) (Mlb) (kt) (%) (Mlb) (%) Mount Milligan 3 Principal 91,827 0.19 384 92,114 0.17 348 732 27,924 0.12 7400% N/A Johnson Camp 90 Producing – – – – – – – 55,818 0.38 472 48% Red Chris 23 Producing – – – 478,714 0.34 3,588 3,588 88,714 0.40 782 81% Voisey’s Bay 91 Producing 1,111 0.99 24 889 1.05 21 45 7,556 0.90 150 80-85% Cactus 89 Development 35,811 0.77 608 319,828 0.57 4,015 4,623 293,157 0.39 2,538 N/A Don Mario 37 Development 135 1.75 5 4,422 0.50 49 54 1,671 0.38 14 Undisclosed Kundip 39 Development – – – 710 0.19 3 3 3,150 0.16 11 N/A Kutcho Creek 40 Development 103 1.64 4 413 6.62 60 64 2,145 1.22 58 87.6-94.5% Las Cruces 92 Development 4,900 2.07 223 900 2.84 56 280 9,400 1.08 224 N/A Ming 43 Development 241 2.40 13 74 1.98 3 16 62 1.75 2 Undisclosed NuevaUnión 44 Development 2,880 0.42 27 71,010 0.51 798 825 205,586 0.30 1,364 89% Berg 49 Evaluation 34,000 0.31 230 976,000 0.23 4,858 5,088 542,000 0.17 2,045 82% Bronson Slope 50 Evaluation – – – – – – – 155,190 0.09 317 Undisclosed Caber 53 Evaluation 800 1.11 20 700 1.07 17 36 – – – Undisclosed High Lake 58 Evaluation – – – 7,900 3.00 522 522 6,000 1.80 238 89% Jaguar Nickel 61 Evaluation – – – 1,300 0.50 14 14 400 0.30 3 76% Los Chancas 93 Evaluation – – – 150,000 0.50 1,648 1,648 1,433,000 0.45 14,165 82-84% Niblack 66 Evaluation – – – 5,851 0.94 121 121 214 0.93 4 94% North Island 68 Evaluation – – – 822,793 0.15 2,766 2,766 204,070 0.12 542 86% Pascua-Lama 71 Evaluation 35,156 0.10 77 276,452 0.09 559 636 15,400 0.05 18 Undisclosed Quinns Austin 74 Evaluation 463 1.22 12 703 0.97 15 28 318 0.85 6 Undisclosed Rock Creek 88 Evaluation – – – – – – – 90,716 0.66 1,317 92% Schaft Creek 77 Evaluation 166,000 0.32 1,171 1,127,200 0.25 6,213 7,384 316,700 0.19 1,327 87% Temora 80 Evaluation – – – 25,000 0.34 187 187 215,000 0.30 1,422 N/A Wolverine 85 Evaluation 553 1.36 17 911 1.51 30 47 539 0.98 12 Undisclosed Introduction Attributes of Our Business Portfolio Overview Expected Performance and Outlook Portfolio Details Reference Materials 171